Rights Activist Raises Alarm Over Health Of American Lady In Police Detention

Adegboruwa Raises Alarm Over Health Of American Lady In Police Custody –  Independent Newspapers Nigeria
Human rights activist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, has raised an alarm  over the deteriorating health of the American lady in police custody, Kari Ann R’ouke.
He spoke   on the heels of the expectations that Kari Ann would be released from custody yesterday, March 19, 2021, upon the fulfilment of all her bail conditions and the acceptance of her surety.
 Adegboruwa stated that he is scared that something devastating may happen to Kari Ann if she is not released forthwith.
  Kari Ann was arrested by the Lagos State Police Command in respect of the death of her friend that she met online and whom she left in good health at the time of her departure to the airport. Autopsy report into the death has consistently shown that he died of cardiac trauma and heart related conditions and that Kari Ann is not in any way connected with the death or suspected of any foul play in any manner whatsoever.
Kari Ann has been in police custody since March 9, 2021, at SCID, Panti, Yaba, where she has lost about 23 pounds and suffered bouts of malaria and dysentery. She has a delicate health condition of severe anaemia, for which she is due for comprehensive medical treatment in America. On March 19, 2021, responsible sureties visited the SCID in Yaba, to sign all documents for the expected release of Kari Ann, with her lawyers, who all spent hours at the police department till late in the night, when they were later informed to go. Upon the execution and perfection of the bail papers, Kari Ann was told to pack her belongings which she did, only to be told later on to go back into custody.
The lawyer appealed to the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Mr. Hakeem Odumosu,  to direct the immediate release of Kari Ann, so that she can attend to her health urgently.
Her international passport has already been seized by the police and a reputable church has volunteered to accommodate Kari Ann in Nigeria until such a time that the police would be willing to allow her travel back to her home state in America.
 Adegboruwa expressed that the police are keeping Kari Ann in perpetual custody for over one month without any charge before any court of law.
He stated further that in this period of the Coronavirus pandemic, it is not safe for any one of Kari Ann’s age with her underlying condition to be kept in police custody for an indefinite period of time.
He urged the police to respect the rule of law and the liberty and freedom of Kari Ann, as she is presumed innocent under the law.
 NJC Recommends Appointment Of  New Judicial Officers

NJC recommends appointment of Heads of Courts, Judicial officers – The Sun  Nigeria
The National Judicial Council under the Chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Honourable Dr. Justice Tanko Muhammad CFR, has recommended the appointment of 26 judicial officers.
The council  made the recommendation at its 94th meeting held from 17 to 18 March, 2021.
At the meeting, NJC considered the list of candidates presented by its Interview Committee and resolved to recommend to President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR, and the Governors of Rivers, Nasarawa, Kogi, Jigawa, Ebonyi and Delta States twenty-six (26) successful candidates for appointment as Justices of Court of Appeal and Heads of Court in Nigeria.
A statement by Soji Oye, Director, Information, NJC,  indicated that
all recommended candidates are expected to be sworn-in after approval by the President, Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR and their respective State Governors and confirmation by the National Assembly and the respective States Houses of Assembly.
He said:”Council at the meeting deliberated on the Reports on 24 petitions written against 29 Judges presented by its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee and decided to empanel an investigation Committee against one Judge and issued two strong warning letters against 2 Judges of the Federal and State High Courts.
“It also resolved to set up a Medical Board to ascertain the health status of one Judge” Oye stated.
In addition, he said, “Council decided to issue strong warning letters to Hon. Justices Mufutau Olokoba and M. A. Savage of the Lagos State High Court.
Hon. Justice Olokoba was reprimanded and also put on the watch list of the Council for his failure to deliver judgement within the Constitutional period of 90 days and Hon,  Justice Savage was reprimanded for not being in charge of his Court, according to the statement.
“The remaining petitions were summarily dismissed for obvious and manifest lack of merit, being subjudice, overtaken by events or that such petitions were matters for appeal.
“The dismissed petitions were against Hon. Justices Rita Nosakhare Pemu, Ita G. Mbaba and Theresa Ngolika Orji-Abadua all of Owerri Division of the Court of Appeal; Hon. Justices O. O. Oguntoyinbo and A. Lewis-Allagoa of the Federal High Court, Hon. Justice Anslem A. Nwaigwe, Chief Judge of Ebonyi State, Hon. Justices M. A. Abubakar, Binta Bawa Rijau of Niger State High Court, Hon. Justice Maurice Odey Eneji of Cross River State and Hon. Justice Kulu Aliyu, Chief Judge, Zamfara State.
“Other petitions dismissed were those written against Hon. Justice S. O. Falola of Osun State Judiciary; Hon. Justices C. C. Okaa, S. N. Odili and P. C. Obiorah, all of Anambra State High Court; Hon. Justice Chukwuemeka – Chikeka, Hon. Justice Ijeoma O. Agugua, Acting Chief Judge of Imo State; Hon. Justice Y. A. Adesanya of the Lagos State Judiciary and Hon. Justices Godwin O. Ollor and S. H. Aprioku of Rivers State High Court.
“Similarly, Council dismissed petitions written against Hon. Justices Hadiza H. Ali-Jos, E. B. Omotoso, I. Ityonyiman, W. O. Animasahun, A. A. Aderibigbe and Hon Kadi M. Y. Usman who served in two Election Petition Tribunals.
“Council also received notifications of retirement of seventeen (17) Judicial Officers and notifications of death of three Judges from the Federal and State Judiciaries.
American Lady Sues Police,Seeks Release From Detention

An American lady, Kari Ann R’ouke, has filed a suit at the Federal High Court, Lagos, against the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Mr. Hakeem Odumosu, asking the court to order her release from police custody.
 In suit No.FHC/L/CS/434/2021 filed at the Registry of the Court on Thursday,  Kari Ann is asking for a declaration that the police is not entitled to arrest and detain her for an indefinite period of time over a matter that does not disclose any reasonable offence, a declaration that her continued remand in perpetuity without a charge is illegal and unconstitutional and for an order directing the police to forthwith release her from illegal custody.
Respondents in the suit filed on her behalf by legal luminary and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, are the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Hakeem Odumosu and the Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of State Criminal Investigation Department, Panti, Yaba, DCP  Adegoke Fayoade. In the affidavit in support of the case, it is stated that Kari Ann is a certified nurse in America, who came to Nigeria sometimes in or about January 21, 2021, to partner with someone he met online to establish a humanitarian outfit.
Upon completing her assignment in Nigeria, she departed for the Murtala Mohammed International Airport on August 8, 2020, enroute America.
She was however stopped by the Immigration Department on the ground that her COVID 19 Test result had expired, whereupon she was made to sleep at the Airport purportedly for a new COVID 19 test.
It was later the following day that she was informed that she was being arrested because her friend had passed on, unknown to her. She has been in police custody ever since. The CCTV footage of the hotel showed clearly that Kari Ann left her friend in the hotel room in good health in the company of his friends and relatives, all of whom were initially arrested but have now been released upon the autopsy report which showed that he died of cardiac arrest, without any foul play.
Kari Ann claimed she  has been a subject of extortion ever since, even though no prima facie case has been established against her.
 Since her incarceration, Kari Ann has lost about 23 pounds in weight, she has emaciated tremendously, she has suffered bouts of malaria, dysentery and she is going through extreme emotional and mental stress, without any link to her family or relatives.
She stated in her affidavit  that she has a delicate medical condition, she is anaemic and thus requires constant medical check up and treatment. She claimed that she is entitled to be released on bail in the same way that the principal suspects have been released and that she is only being persecuted because of her status as a foreign citizen, even when responsible entities and individuals have volunteered to take her on bail. She therefore wants the court to order her release so that she could take care of her delicate health condition and go back to America to join her family.
The reliefs being sought in the case are as follows:
      * A  declaration that the  respondents are not entitled to detain or in any other manner restrict the liberty of the Applicant in flagrant violation of the Applicant’s fundamental rights, guaranteed under sections 34 & 35 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and Articles 4, 5, 6 & 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. 10, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
*A  declaration that the continued detention of the Applicant by the Respondents from February 9, 2021 constitute a flagrant violation of the Applicant’s fundamental rights guaranteed under sections 34, 35, 36 and 46 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended and Articles 4, 5, 6 & 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and therefore is illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.
*A  declaration that the incarceration and continued confinement of the Applicant in perpetuity by the Respondents constitutes a flagrant violation of the Applicant’s fundamental rights guaranteed under section 34, 35, 36 & 46(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and Articles 4, 5, 6 & 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and therefore is illegal, unconstitutional, null and void
*A  declaration that the continued detention, confinement and incarceration of the Applicant since February 9, 2021, by the Respondents, their agents, servants, privies, officers or otherwise howsoever without bringing the Applicant before any court of law or to answer any Charge under any law is a clear violation of the Applicant’s fundamental human rights guaranteed under section 33, 34, 35, 36 and 46(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and Articles 4, 5, 6 & 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and is therefore illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.
*A declaration  that the applicant is entitled to move freely in any part of Nigeria, without let or hindrance from the Respondent in exercise of her fundamental rights guaranteed under sections 35 & 41 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and Articles 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
*A  declaration that the respondents’ constitutional and statutory duty do not extend to unlawful detention of innocent individuals who have not been charged to court or found guilty of any offence by any competent court of law in Nigeria.
*An  order directing the respondents to fortwith cease and abstain from applying for a remand order against the Applicant over matters pertaining to financial crimes to which the Applicant has been in detention since the February 9, 2021.
*An  order directing the respondents, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever to forthwith release the Applicant from unlawful custody.
* An  injunction restraining the Respondents whether themselves, their servants, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever from applying for a remand order against the Applicant in respect of the allegation of any criminal offence to which the Applicant has been in detention since February 9, 2021 all in violation of the applicant’s fundamental right.
*An injunction  restraining the Respondents, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever from further violating the fundamental rights of the Applicant through unlawful arrest and detention.
 *An injunction restraining the Respondents, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever from further arresting, detaining, persecuting, dehumanizing or in any other manner taking steps that may jeopardize the liberty, freedom and life of the Applicant except and in a manner permitted and sanctioned by law.
  *An injunction restraining the Respondents, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever from further constituting a threat or hindrance to the life, human dignity, personal liberty and freedom of the applicant through arrest or detention or remand for the purpose of preventing or disturbing her free movement and liberty in and or outside Nigeria.
*An injunction restraining the respondents, whether by themselves, their servants,, agents, officers or otherwise howsoever from carrying out any acts or omission which is likely to contravene the fundamental rights of the Applicant guaranteed under the Constitution and African Charter.
*One hundred million naira only  being general, aggravated, special and exceptional damages against the respondents, jointly and/ or severally for the violation of the fundamental rights of the applicant.
No date has been assigned for the hearing of the suit.
My Wife Can’t   Prepare Eba,Sales Attendant Tells Court

Minnesota Judicial Branch - News and Announcements
A sales attendant, Stephen Akinseloye,has told a Customary Court in Mapo in Ibadan to dissolve his 15-month-old marriage  because of  his wife’s poor cooking habit  and rudeness.
Specifically,he said his wife ,Opeyemi, does not know how to prepare eba,puts too much salt in food and  refused to take to corrections on improved culinary skills.
Eba is a staple food mainly eaten in the West African subregion,particularly in Nigeria and parts of Ghana.
‘’Opeyemi cannot make simple eba. She puts too much salt in the food. I have shown her and corrected her but she has refused to learn. She is also clumsy. She destroyed my Plasma TV and lies on minor things. She has also refused to join me in prayers. I am a Catholic, she keeps going to Celestial church,’’ Akinseloye said.
Akinseloye, a resident of  Elewura-Challenge area in Ibadan, also disclosed to  the court that his wife  has caused him so much pain by her immaturity.
The defendant denied some of the allegations levelled against her and accused her husband of being a flirt.
In his verdict, the President of the court, Chief Ademola Odunade, maintained  that Opeyemi was responsible for the injury  done to her  affair  having  failed to acquire basic requirements for living a happy marital life.
He  dissolved the marriage on irreconcilable differences  ground  and  granted custody of the only child to Opeyemi.
He ordered Akinseloye to pay N4, 000 monthly for the child’s  welfare
Meanwhile,a Sharia Court  in Dorayi, Kano, granted a woman, Zainab Abubakar, divorce, because her husband of six years, Biko, Salisu Ibrahim, abandoned her for eight months.
Zainab disclosed to  the court that her husband left her and her children. ”My lord, things have not been going well, we are suffering.  “I can hardly pay the school fees for my children. We do not feed well because he did not provide feeding allowance,’ she added.
Ibrahim’s uncle, Malam Muhammed,also  told the court that he’s ignorant of his nephew’s location.
Delivering judgment, Malam Umar Dan-Baba, dissolved the marriage
EFCC Boss Laments Slow Fuel Subsidy Trials 

We Discovered N70 Billion Fraud In Fuel Subsidy, EFCC Boss Laments |  Greenbarge Reporters
Abdulrasheed Bawa,the  Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has lamented the   slow pace of some fuel subsidy trials in the nation’s courts.
He expressed this at the Ikeja High Court in Lagos after testifying in an alleged N1.4 billion fuel subsidy trial involving an oil firm, Nadabo Energy.
He told reporters that  his commission had identified about N70 billion fraud perpetrated through Federal Government’s fuel subsidy programme.
He  also said only about N20 billion of the money had been recovered by the agency,adding  that the commission would continue to rigorously pursue all its cases in court.
According to him, the EFCC was working to arrest an alleged fuel subsidy suspect, Seun Ogunbambo, who was arraigned in 2012 but absconded.
 Bawa appeared in court  to testify in a case involving Nadabo Energy and its Chairman, Abubakar Peters.
The anti-graft agency is prosecuting the defendants for allegedly obtaining N1.4 billion from the Federal Government as oil subsidy, using forged documents.
The defendants are also accused of inflating the quantity of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) purportedly supplied to the Federal Government to 14,000 metric tonnes.
Frozen Accounts:Shell Knows  Court rules March 9

Shell Responds to Interim Freeze Order on its Bank Accounts – Energy Focus Report

A Lagos Federal High Court yesterday   fixed March 9, 2021 to rule on three applications relating to its interim order directing 20 commercial banks to block Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) of Nigeria Ltd accounts for alleged crude oil diversion.

Justice Oluremi Oguntoyinbo fixed the date after hearing arguments from Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) and Emeka Ozoani (SAN) for Aiteo Eastern E & P Company Ltd, Adewale Atake (SAN) for SPDC, Olawale Akoni (SAN) for the banks and Chukwuka Ikwuazom (SAN), for four Shell subsidiaries.

AITEO Eastern E & P Company Ltd is the plaintiff/applicants in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/52/202 and SPDC Ltd is the first defendant.

Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell Western Supply and Trading Ltd, Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd and Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd are second, third, fourth and fifth defendants.

Justice Oguntoyinbo had, on January 25, 2021, directed the banks to “ring-fence any cash, bonds, deposits, all forms of negotiable instruments to the value of $2.7 billion and pay all standing credits to the Shell companies up to the value into an interest yielding account in the name of the Chief Registrar of the court.”

The order followed an application by AITEO Eastern E & P, in its bid to recover the cash value of its “more than 16 million barrels of crude oil” allegedly diverted by Shell.

The defendants subsequently filed an application seeking to discharge the order while Aiteo initiated committal proceedings against two banks and their officials for allegedly “interfering, obstructing and/or frustrating compliance with the interim Mareva orders.

Last Thursday, the judge adjourned to consider whether to first entertain a motion challenging its jurisdiction or to consider contempt proceedings.

At the resumed hearing of the matter on Tuesday, the court considered three applications relating to its jurisdiction, motion to discharge its ex-parte order and the committal proceedings.

Canvassing for the  committal application, Pinheiro reasoned that it was “necessary that the named persons in committal proceedings (the bank officials) be present in court” because the proceedings “attached to their person”.