Policy Alert, a civil society organisation working on economic and ecological justice, has faulted the President’s assent to the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, urging communities to test the provisions of the Act before the courts.
President Muhammadu Buhari had on Monday, signed the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) into law amidst protests from
community groups and many other stakeholders that the Bill was
incompatible with the rights and interests of the host communities.
In a statement signed by its Communications and Stakeholder Engagement Officer, Mrs. Nneka Luke-Ndumere, the organisation described the presidential assent as “grossly insensitive and problematic.”
“It is sad that the bill has been assented to in the most controversial manner despite its many obvious flaws and its rejection by many stakeholders.For example, the controversial provision for a direct payment of 30 percent profit oil and profit gas to the Frontier Exploration Fund potentially shortchanges the oil producing states and local governments
of some of its thirteen percent derivation as it bypasses the requirement in section 162 (2) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended)
which provides that all revenues be channeled through the federation account.
“This is most unfair, viewed against the ceding of only three
percent of previous years’ operating expenses to the Host Communities Development Trust Fund and the punitive provision to charge costs of any damage to facilities against the community’s Fund, among other obnoxious provisions.
The group said that the fact that Mr. President went ahead to give assent to these vexing provisions only reinforces the politics of exclusion and expropriation that has for long characterized the relationship between the Nigerian state and the oil producing communities.
It expressed concern that the
host communities’ component of the legislation flies in the face of one of its stated objectives to address tensions between host communities and companies as it has all the ingredients for escalating rather than abating such conflicts.
It added that:“At a time when fossil fuel investments are being deprioritized
elsewhere as a result of the global energy transition, it is unfortunate
that this Act failed to provide a bridge between the current era of fossil fuel dependency and the low-carbon energy future that Nigeria
aspires to within the framework of government’s much vaunted commitments under the Paris Agreement.”
“Granted, the new legal framework introduces some predictability and clarity to the governance and fiscal arrangements in the oil and gas industry. We are also not oblivious to certain clauses that respond to some of our earlier demands, such as those providing that the Board of Trustees of the Host Communities Development Trust will now be determined in consultation with the host communities, with membership drawn from community members. But that is just as far as it goes. As a tool for improved benefit sharing to host communities, the Act falls flat on its face. It actually ridicules the exertions of the
host communities and advocacy groups that have clamoured over the years
for a law that yields some space for participation, direct socio-economic benefits and environmental remediation for oil-rich
communities.
“The theatre of action will now have to move to the communities and the courts of law. As implementation of the Act gets underway over the next 12 months, we urge host communities and civil society groups to begin to seek interpretation of some of its more controversial provisions before the courts.”
